Turn product claims into third-party evidence.
Give buyers a source beyond your own website. A named expert with relevant topic expertise examines your claims and documents the evidence and limitations.
You fund the assessment. The expert controls the conclusion—positive, mixed or critical.
No payment at this step. Agree the named expert, scope and written quote before checkout.
Illustrative scope · privacy controls
- 01 · Your website says
“Enterprise-grade privacy controls.”
- 02 · An expert examines
Deletion, retention, subprocessors and permissions, within the agreed scope and available access.
- 03 · Public evidence
Named expert. Methodology. Evidence. Limitations. Sponsor and payment disclosed.
The claim may be supported, qualified or challenged.
A full assessment. Your choice to publish.
Original, expert-written assessments.
Fresh text for your brief, written personally by the named expert from their own work. AI-generated or AI-rewritten assessment text, reused assessments and generic filler are not accepted.
Evidence and limitations
The conclusion includes source links and separately stated limitations.
Publication if you approve
You receive the completed assessment before either the expert or the platform publishes. Keep it private or approve the complete record on this network and the expert’s own site or public account, with sponsor and payment disclosure and any company response; workspace users cannot edit published findings.
Only approved public delivery starts the 24-month publication terms. Private assessments stay private. An assessment does not guarantee AI citations, recommendations, rankings or sales.
We plan to share publication-approved assessments in our r/NamedProof community for questions and discussion. Posts will include the expert’s attribution, methods, limitations and funding disclosure, including critical findings. Reddit placement is not sold, and private assessments will not be posted.
Give the next buyer a source, not another claim.
Share the full public assessment, including its scope, limitations and payment disclosure. A critical finding stays part of the record.
- Buyer research & salesLink to the findings in follow-up emails so buyers can examine the evidence themselves.
- Procurement & due diligenceGive buying teams an outside assessment alongside your own answers and documentation.
- PR & comparison pagesLink readers to the full source. Advertising and additional usage licences are not included.
- Google & AI answersA public page is a potential source, not a promised placement. Indexing and citations are not guaranteed. Google’s AI search guidance.
Buyer rulesYou choose publication. The expert owns the findings.
You can
Review the named expert and quote.
Read the completed assessment before publication.
Flag factual errors in your response.
Add a separate company response before publication.
Keep it private or approve the complete public record.
You cannot
Assign yourself a preferred reviewer.
Rewrite the expert's findings, rating or conclusions.
Remove weaknesses from the record.
Make expert compensation depend on the verdict or your publication choice.
Neither the expert nor the platform publishes without your approval.
Choosing not to publish does not entitle you to a refund for completed assessment work. Your statutory rights are unaffected.
These terms apply to new orders. Previously accepted orders retain their agreed terms.
Which product claim should an expert examine?
Describe scope and access; staff propose an expert and quote for your approval before payment. The expert checks the named sponsor for conflicts; calculator ranges are non-binding.
Start an assessment request